Notifications
Clear all
Search result for: WA 0812 2782 5310 Biaya Plafon Gypsum Wet Area Terpercaya Tugu Semarang
Page 3 / 3
Prev
| # | Post Title | Result Info | Date | User | Forum |
| RE: Homebrew Accent Table Build | 2 Relevance | 7 years ago | makerbobdesigns | Table Customization | |
| Parking hits the spot! I have decided that this will be a truly mixed materials project. After a while thinking of a good WAy to make the acrylic sides of the drawing Area with nice even bends, I thought it would be a good time to explore different materials. Aluminum angle would be easy to snip and bend every 5° or so, but it would be a pain to isolate the LEDs from it. I found some PVC edge trim at the local hardware store that is 1-1/8" tall. A bit shorter than I WAnted, but it will work out. I took my parking "valet" with me, and lo and behold, it fits ... | |||||
| RE: One vs Two balls on 3' wooden table | 2 Relevance | 8 years ago | Bruce | Table Usage | |
| @Don, "Can anyone point me to some reading material that might help me progress into a more complex track making game?" Welcome to my world! First off - although I'm pretty sure when it comes to sand plotting, I have more Area under the curve than most - I'm no authority. But with regard to compexity - I would divide it, for now, into those tracks that are generated algorithmically, and those not. So the pumpkin track, and any tracks that you recognize (including text), are non-algorithmic. All the others -'crop circles', spikey or swirly/loopy spirals, and fractals - are created via multilayered recipes (instructions) -aka algorithms. Both branches are infinite design spaces. Markyland created Sisyphus For The Rest Of Us so that people could more easily explore non-alg space. If you're interested in algorithmic pattern space - start googling. All you need to do is place the connect-the-dots in the right order :). | |||||
| Outer two inches of patterns not visible | 2 Relevance | 8 years ago | hdubose1 | Table Usage | |
| The circumference of the drawable Area on the table’s “canvas” is larger than the circumference of the inner-hole of the top ring. As a result, the outer 1-2 inches of many patterns are not visible unless I look at the table up-close and at an awkward viewing angle. When I compare images of the end table used for your Kickstarter campaign with images of your actual production tables, I can see that the width of the top ring has been increased and that the circumference of the inner hole has been decreased. My gut reaction is that the larger inner hole in the top rings from your pre-production units would have been preferable because it would not have resulted in the outside edges of patterns being obscured. But I'm sure that there must be some good reasons for this that I'm not considering. Could you please explain what the design considerations were that led you to make this change? Thanks. | |||||
Page 3 / 3
Prev
We take your privacy seriously and will only use your personal information to provide you with the products and services you request from us. Please see our privacy policy for more details.